Balder Ex-Libris - Radl KarlReview of books rare and missing2024-03-16T01:56:42+00:00urn:md5:aa728a70505b2fae05796923271581c2DotclearRadl Karl - Why semitic controversies was createdurn:md5:38ab622bbadbb95b8645176c99f9f2ed2014-01-13T00:43:00+00:002014-01-13T00:44:07+00:00balderRadl KarlFaliconHistoire InterditeJewYucatan <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img2/.Radl_Karl_-_Why_semitic_controversies_was_created_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Radl Karl</strong><br />
Title : <strong>Why semitic controversies was created</strong><br />
Year : 2008<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook2/Radl_Karl_-_Why_semitic_controversies_was_created.zip">Radl_Karl_-_Why_semitic_controversies_was_created.zip</a><br />
<br />
Some responses that we’ve had to our efforts here at Semitic Controversies have been quite critical of the fact that we take to task the anti-jewish literature far more than we ostensibly do the jews. Although if you carefully read the articles that we have written. It should become apparent that we are not defending jews, but rather making an effort to set anti-jewish discourse on an even and factual keel. Semitic Controversies is doing this, because we believe that anti-jewish literature has been dogged by a whole range of canards, general lack of knowledge about jews and a very two-dimensional interpretation of them as a race. We have found in our considerable combined experience in discoursing with others about jews and with jews themselves. That those who criticise jews are often badly informed about jews and seem to take little trouble in trying to understand their ostensible opponent. It is often the case that those who criticise jews are as badly informed as those who apologise for them. That is an unpleasant statement for strongly anti-jewish people, such as ourselves, to make, but one that is unfortunately a truism at the time of writing. This is not to say that some anti-jewish critiques and writings that have appeared over the years have not been without merit and that there have even been some trenchant ones. That have realistically and precisely defined the jewish foe in the light of the knowledge and literature available at that time. However: what has happened since the end of the Second World War is that discourse about the jews has ceased to evolve for all practical purposes and has not changed to suit the times that it is in or changed state of the intellectual landscape that it now has to contend with. In essence: it has stagnated and the assertions it makes about jews have ready-made powerful answers. Jews can, for example, rightly charge that the quotes from the Talmud used by many are either made-up, altered or taken out of context. <strong>...</strong></p>Radl Karl - The idea of a mass jewish conspiracy in anti-semitismurn:md5:79f3edb094034975422c05362b033d7b2014-01-13T00:40:00+00:002014-01-13T01:01:30+00:00balderRadl KarlConspiracyGlozelHistoire InterditeJewMaya <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img2/.Radl_Karl_-_The_idea_of_a_mass_jewish_conspiracy_in_anti-semitism_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Radl Karl</strong><br />
Title : <strong>The idea of a mass jewish conspiracy in anti-semitism</strong><br />
Year : 2011<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook2/Radl_Karl_-_The_idea_of_a_mass_jewish_conspiracy_in_anti-semitism.zip">Radl_Karl_-_The_idea_of_a_mass_jewish_conspiracy_in_anti-semitism.zip</a><br />
<br />
One thing that has been lacking from anti-Semitism from many years has been a method to the madness; you’ll have to forgive the pun on the philo-Semitic interpretation, is a coherent method to both understanding why the jews are a problem and a threat as well as to understand their past activities and predict; with some degree of accuracy, their future actions. It is perhaps axiomatic of me to mention that in my experience of them: most anti-Semites have very little idea of much to do with jews other than that they know at some level; and in varying degrees, that the jews are their enemy and in some respects an enemy like no other. This holds particularly true when it comes to understanding the jews, because anti-Semites have had a tendency to try and use simple explanations that make sense to them. In essence then anti-Semites have; since time immemorial, been trying to understanding the jews in terms of what the anti-Semites would have to do in order to get the same result. So when a European anti-Semite sits down and thinks about the jewish question he quite naturally places himself in the jew's shoes and thinks out what he would have to do achieve the same disproportionate dominance, the same apparent tribalism and the same ability to silence opponents by jewish-specific buzzwords and character-assassination. This leads to an understanding based on a lack of understanding the jews that we can see as an intellectual cop-out of sorts, but one with huge emotional appeal and a not inconsiderable amount of intellectual appeal as well. This is the idea of the jewish conspiracy with the jew thought to be a sort of secular or theological diabolical agent where the jew's activities and final goal are shrouded in mystery, secrecy and can only be conjectured at. The jew is held to be a sinister figure conspiring through the generations against the gentile world writ large and seemingly randomly picking targets, which are then later rationalised by anti-Semites of varying stripes often as being a deliberate attack on their nation for ‘doing the right thing’ or ‘being a bulwark against their power’ and so forth. This is why I described it as a ‘cop-out’ intellectually, because this way of understanding the jewish question bases itself on the idea that the jewish question is beyond our comprehension in anything other than a general sense. We can’t nail down the jewish intentions because they are completely alien to us and therefore we should only look for where they are directing their activities next so as to discern the latest target. <strong>...</strong></p>Radl Karl - Sources on jews and communismurn:md5:bfc879b77d24b0ad6c51b37e911bd0952014-01-13T00:38:00+00:002014-01-13T00:38:00+00:00balderRadl KarlCommunismHistoire InterditeJewMaya <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img2/.Radl_Karl_-_Sources_on_jews_and_communism_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Radl Karl</strong><br />
Title : <strong>Sources on jews and communism</strong><br />
Year : 2011<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook2/Radl_Karl_-_Sources_on_jews_and_communism.zip">Radl_Karl_-_Sources_on_jews_and_communism.zip</a><br />
<br />
Introductory Note. What I reproduce here, for ease of reference, is a series of quotations from various sources, contemporary and modern, illustrating the hotly debated connection between jews and revolutionary ideas, particularly marxism. What these sources do not provide is proof positive that the jews and communism or jews and bolshevism are interchangeable (which is my opinion an incorrect and overstated argument), but what they do provide is an easy-to-use archive of properly referenced quotes for the use of those engaged in arguments or research on this question. As many of the books I cite are academic in nature and/or are out-of-print: I thought it would be appropriate to provide my readers and the public in general with decent, as opposed to the silly (which proliferate on 'far right' discussion boards and destroy the credibility of those arguing a connection between the two), quotations on this most debated question. <strong>...</strong></p>Radl Karl - Semitic Controversies 2011 Issueurn:md5:8eef56c3a378b3f43a5bcc433f865b462014-01-13T00:24:00+00:002014-01-13T00:35:15+00:00balderRadl KarlConspiracyDreyfusFranceHébraïsmeJew <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img2/.Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2011_Issue_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Radl Karl</strong><br />
Title : <strong>Semitic Controversies 2011 Issue</strong><br />
Year : 2011<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook2/Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2011_Issue.zip">Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2011_Issue.zip</a><br />
<br />
Moshe Katsav the Rapist. Tuesday, 4 January 2011. As you may have read recently ex-Israeli President Moshe Katsav has just been convicted of being a serial rapist by an Israeli court in Tel Aviv. The rapes and general sexual harassment took place during Katsav’s term in office between 2000 and 2007, which indicates to us the sheer scale of Katsav’s criminal activities. What is particularly interesting to us is an article written by the Jewish Telegraphic Association (or JTA for short) writer Dina Kraft entitled ‘Katsav rape conviction hailed as watershed moment’, which has been published in several major jewish media organs in the United States. First of all Kraft points out that Katsav’s Freudian habits were not limited to one particular jewess but rather span numerous victims who no doubt are going to be demanding compensation from just about anyone they can vaguely link to Katsav. Kraft even goes as far as to suggest that this sexual abuse was widely known about by Israeli politicians and the media in general: she implies; of course, that a massive cover-up took place but also tries to excuse this typically immoral behaviour by claiming that male jews see it as part of the perks of their government positions to sexually harass and even rape the jewish (no word about the non-jewish) females employed there. Kraft even claims; by way of indirect apology for Katsav’s actions, that Israel is a ‘nation in arms’ with a ‘machismo’ bent, but this is a little much given that Israel maybe a country with a lot of ostensive military power but as has often been remarked by military analysts the performance of its troops on the ground leaves quite a lot to be desired in spite of the image projected by its propagandists at home and abroad. That said as Shahak and Mezvinsky have observed Israelis have engaged in more than their fair share of atrocities against civilians and then proceeded to try and claim that jews are special and therefore don’t have to abide by the same code as mere mortals. This is also the essence of much of Finkelstein’s critique of Israel’s use of the ‘holocaust’ as a shield and a weapon to silence its enemies. Secondly Kraft argues that the conviction of Katsav is a landmark in Israeli society, because this is essentially the first time that one of the inevitably corrupt Israeli high officials has actually been successfully prosecuted for even the most basic of crimes. Corruption is; of course, an epidemic in Israel even more so than in the People’s Republic of China as unlike the Chinese the jews are almost completely egocentric and have little to no conception of the good of the group and tend to only pay lip service to their stated principles. Another example of this is the ongoing case against the former; and supposedly moderate, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert who is currently in the process of being tried for multiple white collar crimes revolving around his personal finances, corporate connections and abuse of public funds. Is there any other country in the world where corruption is endemic but yet we are told so little about it in the West? While of course the so-called ‘Israel Lobby’ drones on about how wonderful Israel and how much it is contributing to the world in general (anyone think about the implications of that argument so often used by Zionists and its context in Judaism). <strong>...</strong></p>Radl Karl - Semitic Controversies 2010 Issueurn:md5:90df41c5351e8ec896cb8e9ebf86f7342014-01-13T00:22:00+00:002014-01-13T00:22:00+00:00balderRadl KarlConspiracyFranceHébraïsmeJew <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img2/.Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2010_Issue_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Radl Karl</strong><br />
Title : <strong>Semitic Controversies 2010 Issue</strong><br />
Year : 2010<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook2/Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2010_Issue.zip">Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2010_Issue.zip</a><br />
<br />
The Resurrection of Semitic Controversies. Saturday, 27 March 2010. Dear Reader, Unfortunately since my plans for expanding Semitic Controversies into a monthly publication of sorts fell through I have had little time to write since my life has been filled with all kinds of issues (I won't bore you with the reasons or any recrimination on part as I take full and unreserved responsibility for not putting pen to paper). However finally I have had the time and breathing space to sit down and think about what I was going to do with this blog. I have decided, on the basis of encouraging emails and notes from friends and readers, to resurrect this blog as it was originally i.e. a blog about jews from a critical point of view and I have decided to post at least one essay per week on the issue of jews. I have also decided that if I have time I would like to write a little about events in jewry each week. As before any contributions to the blog, letters and criticism can be sent to the Semitic Controversies email box and I will answer them as soon as I am able. Kindest Regards, The Editor, P.S. Oh and yes I might poke a little fun at 'holocaust survivors' from time to time. After all when one actually reads their accounts of what 'happened to them' then one either finds them incredible generally speaking or one takes on faith what they say as the absolute truth. <strong>...</strong></p>Radl Karl - Semitic Controversies 2009 Issueurn:md5:dbfb9a10bfaf80f20fe43a53926f269b2014-01-13T00:19:00+00:002014-01-13T00:20:39+00:00balderRadl KarlConspiracyFranceJewRoi <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img2/.Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2009_Issue_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Radl Karl</strong><br />
Title : <strong>Semitic Controversies 2009 Issue</strong><br />
Year : 2009<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook2/Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2009_Issue.zip">Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2009_Issue.zip</a><br />
<br />
Book Review: Vicomte Léon de Poncins, Undated, (1929), ‘Freemasonry and Judaism : Secret Powers behind the Revolution’, A & B Books: New York Monday, 5 January 2009. Vicomte Léon de Poncins is a name well known in Catholic, anti-Freemasonic and anti-Semitic circles for his numerous, and often quite courageous, works on what he saw as the secret forces that were seeking to subvert society in his day and historically. His work is often cited as a reference by contemporary would-be anti-Semites, as well as serial conspiracy theorists, such as David Duke and Jeff Rense when they make assertions concerning jews in history and in contemporary times. Four of de Poncins’ many books have been translated into English and are often sold in English language nationalist and/or anti-Semitic bookshops. These are: ‘Judaism and the Vatican’, ‘Freemasonry and the Vatican’, ‘State Secrets’ and ‘Freemasonry and Judaism’. It is important to review the two most of important of these, of which the book of primary importance is ‘Freemasonry and Judaism’ since this is the one most cited by these would-be anti-Semites. <strong>...</strong></p>Radl Karl - Semitic Controversies 2008 Issueurn:md5:bd35466c7898280c2ae372413bedce3b2014-01-13T00:13:00+00:002014-01-13T00:17:28+00:00balderRadl KarlConspiracyFranceHébraïsmeJew <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img2/.Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2008_Issue_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Radl Karl</strong><br />
Title : <strong>Semitic Controversies 2008 Issue</strong><br />
Year : 2008<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook2/Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2008_Issue.zip">Radl_Karl_-_Semitic_Controversies_2008_Issue.zip</a><br />
<br />
Dershowitz versus Scholarship: Some Brief Comments on Dershowitz’s 'Critique' of Walt and Mearsheimer. Sunday, 15 June 2008. Alan Dershowitz’s recent blog article ‘Double Standard Watch: Questions for Walt and Mearsheimer’ at the Jersusalem Post website is for any student of Dershowitz’s screeds; I won’t say writings because I personally don’t consider his written work on Israel and jews to be even educated polemics, an interesting one in terms of Dershowitz’s usual hysterics. To paraphrase Finkelstein in ‘Beyond Chutzpah’ Dershowitz desperately wants to prove something and will marshal any ‘evidence’ and make any tenuous connection to make his case. In this case; he wants to prove that Walt and Mearsheimer (and presumably his other opponents; such as Neumann and Finkelstein) base their research on ‘out-of-context quotes’ that they ‘lifted from anti-Semitic, neo-Nazi and radical Islamic hate sites.’ Now having read Walt and Mearsheimer’s book ‘The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy’ fairly recently I don’t recall any conclusions from such supposed ‘bad sources’; the question of what about a ‘hateful’ site makes it a bad source of information is of course a more lengthy and more detailed discussion that I won’t enter into here, nor do I immediately recall any citation of such sources. Perhaps Dershowitz could be specific in what he means and where Walt and Mearsheimer are supposedly skimming their research from such sources. Walt and Mearsheimer do mention David Duke once and in passing as an example but they promptly condemn him. However as veteran Dershowitz readers will well know he makes these kind of charges on a regular basis in both his books and other published work; his enemies are always ‘haters’, ‘anti-Semites’, ‘Nazis’, ‘Shoah/Holocaust Deniers’ and lord knows else. It is also interesting that Dershowitz immediately does exactly what he did to Finkelstein in his ‘The Case for Israel’ in declaring the following to create the suggestion of considerable specific scholarly criticism and condemnation (in both cases one easily imagines Dershowitz with an animalistic sneer plastered across his face); ‘That is why so many of their own colleagues - Jewish and not Jewish -have trashed their work as "piss-poor" research (as one colleague put it).’ Have ‘so many’ of ‘their own colleagues’ ‘trashed’ their work; not according to what I’ve read although Dershowitz and associates have circled numerous petitions condemning them for invented offences (some of which I have been forwarded by gracious friends) and engaging in a covert; as well as overt, personal campaign against them; much as it was revealed he had considerable hand in Finkelstein being denied tenure at De Paul University. But perhaps it is better to ask; why; if some colleagues disagree so strongly, there has not been a devastating critique brought out against the book from the direction that Dershowitz argues from i.e. that the people of the United States love Israel so much and have so many ‘shared values’ they just want to give it $3 billion per annum. Alright; I am massively simplifying the argument here but it makes the point that needs to be made regardless. <strong>...</strong></p>Radl Karl - My journey from ethnocentrism to egocentrismurn:md5:9618dcc743d44607ce739458a05ff4482014-01-13T00:12:00+00:002014-01-13T00:14:32+00:00balderRadl KarlDreyfusFranceHébraïsmeJew <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img2/.Radl_Karl_-_My_journey_from_ethnocentrism_to_egocentrism_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Radl Karl</strong><br />
Title : <strong>My journey from ethnocentrism to egocentrism</strong><br />
Year : 2010<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook2/Radl_Karl_-_My_journey_from_ethnocentrism_to_egocentrism.zip">Radl_Karl_-_My_journey_from_ethnocentrism_to_egocentrism.zip</a><br />
<br />
Comment 1. Well you see the problem there is assuming there is a big jew so to speak. It is an intellectualisation that is kind of unhelpful, although understandable (since Aryans would have to act in that way to achieve the same effect), because it presumes there is a central deciding point. I don't know if you mean the individual jews in charge of the corporation, but I'll assume for the way it is worded that it is meant as a conspiratorial point (i.e. one big jew not many different ones so-to-speak). When you see a news program what you are seeing is the editors preference with the presenters charm. The Editor is of course behold to his manager and so forth up to the CEO who is appointed by those who own the corporation. It doesn't matter so much whether the jews own or the jews just are at the top levels of management, but the key is that they are in a position to impose their views and ideology onto their subordinates. If you notice the media doesn't have one line, but it does have several different lines on any given news show, some cater to the communist, some to the weak-willed liberal, others to 'conservatives' and so forth. There is no central control of that, but that it is jews successfully selling their thoughts to others that is the problem. When a jew educates someone at university that jew will have instilled in them their fundamental ideology, and perhaps when they read another jews book and become converts to another ideology (sometimes the inverse of their previous one), and when they go into the media as a journalist, a manager or even as a owner. They take these beliefs with them that even with no jews at the top level or as owners: they impose these jewish-inspired beliefs onto their corporation in the same way that a CEO or a manager imposes their belief in restructuring onto a corporation. It is a war of the mind and it doesn’t need a conspiracy, but when a jew imposes his thoughts on another race and there is a consistent imposition of jewish thought then that provides a non-deliberate, and more effective as it happens, control of the media by changing the poles within in which the media operates. If we look at the Zionist jews as an example: we see that they are not in control of the media per se. They do have Rupert Murdoch, who despite claims to the contrary is not jewish as far as the evidence has been presented indicates, but he is only part of it. The jews know, and by jews I mean supporters of Israel trying to out do each other in their support of Israel in an eternal game of one-up-manship common to jewish culture, that in order to do this the most effective way is to set boundaries and to police those boundaries they use a series of organisations (sometimes jewish (some of which were originally anti-Zionist) and sometimes not) to attack the points at which they want the poles of discussion and acceptability to change and to engage in advocacy to support that change. <strong>...</strong></p>Radl Karl - Jewish conspiracy theories and jewish characterurn:md5:21b010b18abdf829dfef474c8e4da1c32014-01-13T00:08:00+00:002014-01-13T00:09:21+00:00balderRadl KarlConspiracyFranceHébraïsmeJew <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img2/.Radl_Karl_-_Jewish_conspiracy_theories_and_jewish_character_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Radl Karl</strong><br />
Title : <strong>Jewish conspiracy theories and jewish character</strong><br />
Year : 2012<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook2/Radl_Karl_-_Jewish_conspiracy_theories_and_jewish_character.zip">Radl_Karl_-_Jewish_conspiracy_theories_and_jewish_character.zip</a><br />
<br />
Comment 1. Well you see the problem there is assuming there is a big jew so to speak. It is an intellectualisation that is kind of unhelpful, although understandable (since Aryans would have to act in that way to achieve the same effect), because it presumes there is a central deciding point. I don't know if you mean the individual jews in charge of the corporation, but I'll assume for the way it is worded that it is meant as a conspiratorial point (i.e. one big jew not many different ones so-to-speak). When you see a news program what you are seeing is the editors preference with the presenters charm. The Editor is of course behold to his manager and so forth up to the CEO who is appointed by those who own the corporation. It doesn't matter so much whether the jews own or the jews just are at the top levels of management, but the key is that they are in a position to impose their views and ideology onto their subordinates. If you notice the media doesn't have one line, but it does have several different lines on any given news show, some cater to the communist, some to the weak-willed liberal, others to 'conservatives' and so forth. There is no central control of that, but that it is jews successfully selling their thoughts to others that is the problem. When a jew educates someone at university that jew will have instilled in them their fundamental ideology, and perhaps when they read another jews book and become converts to another ideology (sometimes the inverse of their previous one), and when they go into the media as a journalist, a manager or even as a owner. They take these beliefs with them that even with no jews at the top level or as owners: they impose these jewish-inspired beliefs onto their corporation in the same way that a CEO or a manager imposes their belief in restructuring onto a corporation. It is a war of the mind and it doesn’t need a conspiracy, but when a jew imposes his thoughts on another race and there is a consistent imposition of jewish thought then that provides a non-deliberate, and more effective as it happens, control of the media by changing the poles within in which the media operates. If we look at the Zionist jews as an example: we see that they are not in control of the media per se. They do have Rupert Murdoch, who despite claims to the contrary is not jewish as far as the evidence has been presented indicates, but he is only part of it. The jews know, and by jews I mean supporters of Israel trying to out do each other in their support of Israel in an eternal game of one-up-manship common to jewish culture, that in order to do this the most effective way is to set boundaries and to police those boundaries they use a series of organisations (sometimes jewish (some of which were originally anti-Zionist) and sometimes not) to attack the points at which they want the poles of discussion and acceptability to change and to engage in advocacy to support that change. <strong>...</strong></p>