Balder Ex-Libris - Riis-Knudsen Povl HeinrichReview of books rare and missing2024-03-16T01:56:42+00:00urn:md5:aa728a70505b2fae05796923271581c2DotclearRiis-Knudsen Povl Heinrich - National socialism A left-wing movementurn:md5:9cd2488d67c78b31efc31bbced5496ca2012-07-16T17:36:00+01:002020-08-30T13:21:05+01:00balderRiis-Knudsen Povl HeinrichGermanyThird Reich <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img/.Riis-Knudsen_Povl_H_-_National_socialism_A_left-wing_movement_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Riis-Knudsen Povl Heinrich</strong><br />
Title : <strong>National socialism A left-wing movement</strong><br />
Year : 2010<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook/Riis-Knudsen_Povl_Heinrich_-_National_socialism_A_left-wing_movement.zip">Riis-Knudsen_Povl_Heinrich_-_National_socialism_A_left-wing_movement.zip</a><br />
<br />
For far too many years it has been widely accepted that National Socialists are extreme right- wingers, and only rarely have they hestitated to refer to themselves as such. At a certain point, however, it became the official policy of the World Union of National Socialists to avoid the term "right-wing," claiming that National Socialism does not fit into the pattern of "right" and "left" and instead ought to be considered as standing above this distinction. This most certainly was a step in the right direction, but at this time and within the context of the current struggle it might, however, be a good idea to reconsider the whole question about political wings and make a few points clear concerning the meaning of the terms "right" and "left" and their application to today's political scene. Historically, the words" right" and. !left'' in reference to ( .political views originated in_, pre-revolutionary France, where i those who wanted to preserve the system of government<sup> more or less as it was sat</sup> to the. Right in the Natjonal Assembly, whereas those who wanted more radical changes sat to the left. Hence, the term "right" for the reactionaries and "left" for the revolutionaries— terms that have since become universally known and used. Neither the word "reactionary" nor the word "revolutionary," however, says anything universal about the particular views in question. They are both relative and receive their specific meaning only within a given historical context. The revolutionaries of former times, as for instance, the European National Liberals of the 19th century, do not seem very revolutionary today—quite the contrary!— just as .today's reactionaries would have been considered very revolutionary 200 years ago. When the Communists took over in Russia in 1917 they did so as revolutionaries out to overthrow an ineffective and corrupt regime, whereas today they represent the reactionary establishment facing a new revolutionary challenge. In our time the traditional left wing is predominantly Marxist —even to such a degree that the very term "left wing" is thought to be synonymous with the word "Marxist." This, of course, has no basis in reality. Any revolutionary is a left-winger—it is just that the Marxists have had so little competition that they have been able to appropriate the term. On the other side of the political spectrum we have the right wing, consisting of reactionaries who want to preserve the present society and the so-called Christian civilization of the West with its materialism and capitalism. The rightwingers stand up for traditional patriotic values: they are good Christians and good citizens who defend the Constitution and are loyal to their country and their monarch, if they have one. They are willing to go to war against any other nation to assert the greatness of their own—even if it means waging a nuclear war against another White country if they think its system of government threatens their own domestic order, no matter how corrupt and degenerate it may be. They are for an economy based on unrestricted free enterprise, regardless of the .consequences, but they resent the Liberal trend in politics as well as immigration and racial integration, because they fear any changes that could upset the order to which they are accustomed. <strong>...</strong></p>Riis-Knudsen Povl Heinrich - National socialism The Biological World Viewurn:md5:bba0cb6c892d4209b61e308a4648d8002012-07-16T17:29:00+01:002020-08-30T13:21:19+01:00balderRiis-Knudsen Povl HeinrichGermanyRacialismThird Reich <p><img src="https://balderexlibris.com/public/img/.Riis-Knudsen_Povl_H_-_National_socialism_The_Biological_World_View_s.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Author : <strong>Riis-Knudsen Povl Heinrich</strong><br />
Title : <strong>National socialism The Biological World View</strong><br />
Year : 2007<br />
<br />
Link download : <a href="https://balderexlibris.com/public/ebook/Riis-Knudsen_Povl_Heinrich_-_National_socialism_The_Biological_World_View.zip">Riis-Knudsen_Povl_Heinrich_-_National_socialism_The_Biological_World_View.zip</a><br />
<br />
"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to state this or that or the other, but it is "not done". Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness. A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing, either in the popular press or in the highbrow periodicals". George Orwell. As a National Socialist you constantly experience the difficulty in carrying on a meaningful conversation with a Non-National Socialist. You often feel that such a dialogue is outright impossible and that you live in two totally different worlds. Partly, of course, the reason for this deplorable situation lies in the propaganda image of National Socialism as the culmination of human viciousness that our enemies have created in the public mind. However, to young people what happened half a century ago is not all that important any more. From their earliest childhood they have been able to follow all the malice and cruelty that has been ravaging the world since the "victory of humanism" in 1945, vividly presented through television, and there is a very encouraging tendency among the young generation to have a less biased attitude to life and its various problems than the previous generation had. However, this does not mean that young people have any idea at all what National Socialism is really all about, nor that they show much comprehension when you tell them. They have grown up in a world where they have been deliberately alienated from all natural values and natural ethical norms and taught that everything is relative, and where the borderline between truth and lie has ceased to exist, as there are no absolutes and everything depends on the way you choose to look at it. In this value-free world people live in a mental vacuum, totally out of contact with the real world, its relentless biological laws, and absolute moral and social obligations, and it is unavoidable that the National Socialist idea is felt as an incomprehensible alien element in such a political and philosophical universe. As opposed to today's carefree relativism, where all ideas - in principle at least - are equally acceptable and valid, National Socialism represents the unremitting effort to find the absolute truth and to make this. truth the foundation of human society. Unlike the nebulous ravings of inane armchair philosophers and oriental mysticism, however, National Socialism is based on common sense, and it seeks its arguments in the real world, where the difference between truth and lie and between good and evil is determined by facts and not by wishful thinking and theoretic reveries. In this light it is obvious that National Socialism must reject the conceptions and moral norms of all the ruling ideologies, and this, naturally, leads to a comprehensibility gap that is difficult to bridge - simply because there is no common frame of reference between National Socialists and people whose thinking is determined by the ideas of the present order. National Socialism simply means an absolute, irrevocable, and uncompromising fight against the very philosophical foundations of the entire ruling world order. On the following pages we shall try to explain the implications of such a showdown. <strong>...</strong></p>