Balder Ex-Libris

Author : Lehrman Leland
Title : ADL, Zionist Policies, Causing Rise In Anti-Jewish Sentiment
Year : 2010

Link download : Lehrman_Leland_-_ADL_Zionist_Policies_Causing_Rise_In_Anti-Jewish_Sentiment.zip

I am an American citizen of Jewish heritage concerned about the methods and doctrines that the criminal leadership of the Jewish and Zionist hierarchy have promoted worldwide. I feel that Jewish Americans need to affirm loyalty to the Constitution of the United States of America as well as the Ten Commandments and the Golden Rule, rather than the racist attitudes of the Talmud and other Jewish scriptures. My former intelligence friends are advising that I move quickly to publicize my situation in order to protect myself through publicity. The central assertion that the ADL makes is that I am "promoting the Protocols of Zion." On the face of it, that is incorrect, because, in fact, I am deploring the Protocols of Zion, which is without doubt, a template for world domination by a criminal elite. There is a debate about its authenticity, but it has not been proven a forgery by any means, and, sadly, it fits neatly into the context of Jewish Supremacist doctrine found the Old Testament, the Talmud and the Zohar. My understanding is that the only court ruling which found it to be a forgery, in Switzerland, was overturned on appeal by the high court of that land. ADL further asserts that by my "promotion of the Protocols of Zion" I am sponsoring anti-semitism of the Nazi variety. This too is libelous as I have always made clear, taking great pains to do so, that the Protocols do not legitimate racial or religious bias, but represent evidence in a criminal case that involves leadership and doctrinal matters. In my below defense, I present the essential case for the authenticity of the Protocols of Zion. Drawing from the works of Fraser, Shishmareff, Fahey, Dilling, Freedman, Makow, Brafmann and others, it can be easily demonstrated that the Protocols represent the coherent viewpoint of the Jewish Supremacists of the time. If there has been some interpolation (modifications over time incorporating evolving bias) in the Protocols, that would be natural for a historical document. There is evidence of interpolation in the Bible and most historical narratives that have been translated, copied and preserved by historians of varying intellectual prejudices. But nobody accuses biblical scholars of promoting a forgery because the Bible has some interpolations in it. It is not considered illicit behavior to read the Bible although it certainly contains racist statements and even insists in places that the Jewish people will ultimately rule over all other peoples. So, why is it that the Protocols are so much of an anathema ? ...